What is Greenhouse Effect ?
The Greenhouse Effects is a term that refers to a physical property of the Earth’s atmosphere. If the Earth had no atmosphere, its average surface temperature would be very low of about -18¢J rather than the comfortable 15¢J found today. The difference in temperature is due to a suite of gases called greenhouse gases which affect the overall energy balance of the Earth’s system by absorbing infra-red radiation. In its existing state, the Earth-atmosphere system balances absorption of solar radiation by emission of infrared radiation to space. Due to greenhouse gases, the atmosphere absorbs more infrared energy than it re-radiates to space, resulting in a net warming of the Earth-atmosphere system and of surface temperature. This is the Natural Greenhouse Effects. With more greenhouse gases released to the atmosphere due to human activity, more infrared radiation will be trapped in the Earth’s surface which contributes to the Enhanced Greenhouse Effects.
Types of Greenhouse gases
Greenhouse gases comprise less than 1% of the atmosphere. Their levels are determined by a balance between ¡§sources¡¨ and ¡§sinks¡¨. Sources and sinks are processes that generate and destroy greenhouse gases respectively. Human affect greenhouse gas levels by introducing new sources or by interfering with natural sinks.
The major greenhouse gases in the atmosphere are carbon dioxide (CO2), methane, (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and ozone (O3). Atmospheric water vapour (H2O) also makes a large contribution to the natural greenhouse effect but it is thought that its presence is not directly affected by human activity. Characteristics of some of the greenhouse gases are shown in Table 1.
Global Warming Potential (GWP)
Different greenhouse gases exert different effects on the Earth’s energy balance. In order to assist policymakers to measure the impact of various greenhouse gases on global warming, the concept of Global Warming Potentials (GWPs) was introduced by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in its 1990 report. GWP reflects the relative strength of individual greenhouse gas with respect to its impact on global warming. It was defined as the cumulative radiative forcing* between the present and some future time caused by a unit mass of greenhouse gas emitted now, expressed relative to CO2. The GWPs developed by IPCC for a number of greenhouse gases are shown in Table 2.
Global Warming Potentials take into account the differing atmospheric lifetimes and abilities of various gases to absorb radiation. Derivations of GWPs requires knowledge of the fate of the emitted gas (typically not well understood) and the radiative forcing due to the amount remaining in the atmosphere (reasonably well understood). Hence, GWPs encompass certain uncertainty, typically + 35% relative to CO2 reference.
* Radiative forcing is defined as a change in average net radiation at the top of the troposphere (tropopause) due to a change in either solar or infrared radiation. A radiative forcing perturbs the balance between incoming and outgoing radiation. A positive radiative forcing tends on average to warm the Earth’s surface; a negative radiative forcing tends on average to cool the Earth’s surface.
Trends in greenhouse gas concentrations
a) Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
High-quality observations of the concentration of CO2 began in 1958, with flask measurements at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii. Fig. 2 shows that the average annual concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere has risen from about 315 ppmv (part per million by volume) in 1958 to around 363 ppmv in 1997. There is a clear annual cycle in the Mauna Loa data that corresponds to the annual cycle of plant respiration in the Northern Hemisphere : CO2 concentration increase during the Fall and Winter and decline during Spring and Summer. This cycle, follows the growth and die back of vegetation, is reversed and of smaller amplitude in the Southern Hemisphere, and disappears almost entirely in the data measured near the Equator.
b) Methane (CH4)
The rate of increase of the atmospheric abundance of methane has declined over the last decade, slowing dramatically in 1991 to 1992, though with an apparent increase in the growth rate in late 1993 (Fig. 3). The average trend over 1980 to 1990 is about 13 ppbv/year (part per billion by volume/year).
c) Nitrous Oxide (N2O)
Over the last four decades, the average growth rate of N2O is about 0.25%/year (Fig. 4). Current tropospheric concentration of N2O is around 312 to 314 ppbv.
d) Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)
Among the family compounds of chlorocarbons, CFCl3 (CFC-11) and CF2Cl2 (CFC-12) are receiving more attention because of their larger concentrations and potentially significant effects on stratospheric ozone. CFC-11 and CFC-12 have the highest concentrations of the man-made chlorocarbons, around 0.27 and 0.55 ppbv, respectively (measured at Mauna Loa in 1997, Fig. 5 & 6). As indicated in their GWP values, these two gases are strong infrared absorbers. It is thought that CFC-11 and CFC-12 have contributed about one-third of the radiative forcing of gases other than CO2 during the 1980s.
Consequences of Enhanced Greenhouse Effect
i) Global Warming
Increase of greenhouse gases concentration causes a reduction in outgoing infrared radiation, thus the Earth’s climate must change somehow to restore the balance between incoming and outgoing radiation. This ¡§climatic change¡¨ will include a ¡§global warming¡¨ of the Earth’s surface and the lower atmosphere as warming up is the simplest way for the climate to get rid of the extra energy. However, a small rise in temperature will induce many other changes, for example, cloud cover and wind patterns. Some of these changes may act to enhance the warming (positive feedbacks), others to counteract it (negative feedbacks).
Using complex climate models, the “Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change” in their third assessment report has forecast that global mean surface temperature will rise by 1.4¢J to 5.8¢J by the end of 2100. This projection takes into account the effects of aerosols which tend to cool the climate as well as the delaying effects of the oceans which have a large thermal capacity. However, there are many uncertainties associated with this projection such as future emission rates of greenhouse gases, climate feedbacks, and the size of the ocean delay …etc.
ii) Sea Level Rise
If global warming takes place, sea level will rise due to two different processes. Firstly, warmer temperature cause sea level to rise due to the thermal expansion of seawater. Secondly, water from melting glaciers and the ice sheets of Greenland and the Antarctica would also add water to the ocean. It is predicted that the Earth’s average sea level will rise by 0.09 to 0.88 m between 1990 and 2100.
Potential Impact on human life
a) Economic Impact
Over half of the human population lives within 100 kilometres of the sea. Most of this population lives in urban areas that serve as seaports. A measurable rise in sea level will have a severe economic impact on low-lying coastal areas and islands, for examples, increasing the beach erosion rates along coastlines, rising sea level displacing fresh groundwater for a substantial distance inland.
b) Agricultural Impact
Experiments have shown that with higher concentrations of CO2, plants can grow bigger and faster. However, the effect of global warming may affect the atmospheric general circulation and thus altering the global precipitation pattern as well as changing the soil moisture contents over various continents. Since it is unclear how global warming will affect climate on a regional or local scale, the probable effects on the biosphere remains uncertain.
c) Effects on Aquatic systems
The loss of coastal wetlands could certainly reduce fish populations, especially shellfish. Increased salinity in estuaries could reduce the abundance of freshwater species but could increase the presence of marine species. However, the full impact on marine species is not known.
d) Effects on Hydrological Cycle
Global precipitation is likely to increase. However, it is not known how regional rainfall patterns will change. Some regions may have more rainfall, while others may have less. Furthermore, higher temperatures would probably increase evaporation. These changes would probably create new stresses for many water management systems.
